Finding What the Reports Leave Out

Setra Law Firm, PC conducts detailed video audits in San Antonio to compare body cam, dash cam, and interrogation footage against arrest reports and probable cause affidavits.

Body cam and dash cam footage often tells a different story than the one written in police reports. Officers in San Antonio may describe events in ways that justify an arrest or search, but the video shows hesitation, conflicting statements, missing warnings, or actions that do not match their written narrative.

Setra Law Firm, PC watches every second of available footage, including body cam, dash cam, booking video, interrogation recordings, and jail calls when applicable. Time stamps are analyzed to detect missing footage or unexplained gaps, and every statement made by officers or witnesses on video is compared to what appears in arrest reports, probable cause affidavits, and testimony. The goal is to identify unlawful searches, improper detentions, Miranda violations, and assumptions presented as fact.

If you were arrested in San Antonio and want your case reviewed for inconsistencies between video and written reports, contact Setra Law Firm, PC to begin the audit process.

What Gets Uncovered During Frame-by-Frame Review

Setra Law Firm, PC does not skim video or accept summaries from the prosecution. Every recording is watched in full, with attention to officer conduct, suspect responses, timing of events, and what was said before and after key moments in San Antonio.

Discrepancies between video and reports often include exaggerated descriptions of behavior, omitted context, selective recall, and statements attributed to defendants that were never made on camera. Video also reveals when officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a stop, conducted searches without consent or warrant, or failed to provide proper warnings before questioning.

Missing footage or time gaps are flagged and questioned, as unexplained breaks in recording can indicate technical failure or intentional editing. Setra Law Firm, PC uses these findings to challenge the credibility of officer testimony and the legality of evidence collection.

Defendants in San Antonio often assume video always supports the police version of events, but that is not the case, and these answers explain what video review can actually reveal.

Common Concerns About Video Evidence

Setra Law Firm, PC reviews body cam, dash cam, booking footage, interrogation videos, and jail call recordings when they exist. Each type of video can contradict officer reports or reveal procedural violations.
What types of video are reviewed during a criminal case?
Time stamps are compared across multiple video sources and cross-referenced with report timelines. Unexplained gaps or sudden cuts raise questions about what was left out or not recorded.
How do you identify missing footage?
Contradictions are used to challenge officer credibility, probable cause, and the admissibility of evidence. Setra Law Firm, PC prepares cross-examination questions based on specific discrepancies found during the audit.
What happens if the video contradicts the arrest report?
Why does video review matter if the officer seems credible?
Officers often make assumptions or describe events from memory that do not match what actually occurred on camera. Video allows you to challenge their version without relying on subjective impressions.
The absence of video can itself be significant, especially if department policy or state law required recording. Setra Law Firm, PC investigates why footage is missing and whether that absence affects the reliability of the government's case.
What if no video exists for my case?

Video often contradicts officer assumptions, not just obvious facts, and those contradictions can change the outcome of your case. If you need a full audit of video evidence in San Antonio, get in touch with Setra Law Firm, PC to start the review.